Explanation in the science of consciousness: From the neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs) to the difference makers of consciousness (DMCs)


Neural correlates

How to Cite

Klein, C., Hohwy, J., & Bayne, T. (2020). Explanation in the science of consciousness: From the neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs) to the difference makers of consciousness (DMCs). Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 1(II). https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2020.II.60


At present, the science of consciousness is structured around the search for the neural correlates of consciousness (the NCCs). One of the alleged advantages of the NCCs framework is its metaphysical neutrality—the fact that it begs no contested questions with respect to debates about the fundamental nature of consciousness. Here, we argue that even if the NCC framework is metaphysically neutral, it is structurally committed, for it presupposes a certain model—what we call the Lite-Brite model—of consciousness. This, we argue, represents a serious liability for the NCC framework for the plausibility of the Lite-Brite model is very much an open question, and the science of consciousness would be better served by a framework that does not presuppose it. Drawing on interventionist ideas in the philosophy of science, we suggest that the Difference-Maker framework can provide just such an alternative. Instead of searching for the neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs), we ought to be searching for the difference makers of consciousness (DMCs). We detail how a shift to searching DMCs will change both the practice of consciousness science and the interpretation of existing results.



Anderson, M. L. (2014). After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. MIT Press.

Aru, J., Bachmann, T., Singer, W., & Melloni, L. (2012). Distilling the neural correlates of consciousness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(2), 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.003

Baumgartner, M., & Gebharter, A. (2016). Constitutive relevance, mutual manipulability, and fat-handedness. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67(3), 731–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axv003

Bayne, T. (2007). Conscious states and conscious creatures: Explanation in the scientific study of consciousness. Philosophical Perspectives, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00118.x

Bayne, T. (2010). The unity of consciousness. Oxford University Press.

Bayne, T., Hohwy, J., & Owen, A. M. (2016). Are there levels of consciousness? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(6), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.009

Block, N. (2005). Two neural correlates of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.006

Boly, M., Massimini, M., Tsuchiya, N., Postle, B. R., Koch, C., & Tononi, G. (2017). Are the neural correlates of consciousness in the front or in the back of the cerebral cortex? Clinical and neuroimaging evidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(40), 9603–9613. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3218-16.2017

Chalmers, D. J. (2000). What is a neural correlate of consciousness. In T. Metzinger (Ed.), Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions (pp. 17–39). MIT Press.

Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain. Oxford University Press.

Craver, C., & Kaplan, D. M. (2011). Towards a mechanistic philosophy of neuroscience. In S. French & J. Saatsi (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to the philosophy of science (pp. 268–292). A&C Black.

Crick, F. (1996). Visual perception: Rivalry and consciousness. Nature, 379(6565), 485–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/379485a0

Crick, F. C., & Koch, C. (2005). What is the function of the claustrum? Philosophical Transactions. Biological Sciences, 360(1458), 1271–1279. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1661

Cummins, R. (2000). How does it work? Versus what are the laws?: Two conceptions of psychological explanation. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 117–144). MIT Press.

De Graaf, T. A., Hsieh, P.-J., & Sack, A. T. (2012). The “correlates” in neural correlates of consciousness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(1), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.012

Dretske, F. I. (1997). Naturalizing the mind. MIT Press.

Fink, S. B. (2016). A deeper look at the “neural correlate of consciousness”. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1044. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01044

Friston, K. J., Price, C. J., Fletcher, P., Moore, C., Frackowiak, R. S., & Dolan, R. J. (1996). The trouble with cognitive subtraction. Neuroimage, 4(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1996.0033

Funkhouser, E. (2006). The determinable-determinate relation. Noûs, 40(3), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2006.00623.x

Hill, C. S. (1991). Sensations: A defense of type materialism. Cambridge University Press.

Hohwy, J. (2009). The neural correlates of consciousness: New experimental approaches needed? Consciousness and Cognition, 18(2), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.02.006

Hohwy, J., & Frith, C. (2004). Can neuroscience explain consciousness? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(7-8), 180–198.

Irvine, E. (2013). Consciousness as a scientific concept: A philosophy of science perspective (Vol. 5). Springer.

Janssen, A. (2019). Explanations in neuroimaging research [PhD thesis]. Radboud University Nijmegen.

Kaplan, D. M. (2012). How to demarcate the boundaries of cognition. Biology & Philosophy, 27(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9308-4

Kästner, L., & Andersen, L. M. (2018). Intervening into mechanisms: Prospects and challenges. Philosophy Compass, 13(11), e12546. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12546

Klein, C. (2017). Brain regions as difference-makers. Philosophical Psychology, 30(1–2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1253053

Klein, C., & Barron, A. B. (2020). How experimental neuroscientists can fix the hard problem of consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 06(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa009

Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2016). Neural correlates of consciousness: Progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(5), 307. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.22

Laureys, S. (2005). The neural correlate of (un) awareness: Lessons from the vegetative state. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.010

McLaughlin, B. (2007). Type materialism for phenomenal consciousness. In S. Schneider & M. Velmans (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to consciousness (pp. 431–444). Wiley Online Library.

Metzinger, T. (2000). Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions. MIT Press.

Miller, S. M. (2007). On the correlation/constitution distinction problem (and other hard problems) in the scientific study of consciousness. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 19(3), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5215.2007.00207.x

Miracchi, L. (2017). Generative explanation in cognitive science and the hard problem of consciousness. Philosophical Perspectives, 31(1), 267–291. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12095

Neisser, J. (2012). Neural correlates of consciousness reconsidered. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.012

Neisser, J. (2015). The science of subjectivity. Springer.

Noë, A., & Thompson, E. (2004). Are there neural correlates of consciousness? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11(1), 3–28. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/2004/00000011/00000001/1400

Odegaard, B., Knight, R. T., & Lau, H. (2017). Should a few null findings falsify prefrontal theories of conscious perception? Journal of Neuroscience, 37(40), 9593–9602. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3217-16.2017

Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge University Press.

Polger, T. W. (2006). Natural minds. MIT Press.

Searle, J. R. (2000). Consciousness. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23(1), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.557

Shoemaker, S. (1981). Some varieties of functionalism. Philosophical Topics, 12(1), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics198112145

Sporns, O. (2011). Networks of the brain. MIT Press.

Sterelny, K., & Kitcher, P. (1988). The return of the gene. The Journal of Philosophy, 85(7), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026953

Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9

Stiefel, K. M., Merrifield, A., & Holcombe, A. O. (2014). The claustrum’s proposed role in consciousness is supported by the effect and target localization of salvia divinorum. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00020

Tsao, D. Y., & Livingstone, M. S. (2008). Mechanisms of face perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094238

Tye, M. (1995). Ten problems of consciousness: A representational theory of the phenomenal mind. MIT Press.

Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen. Oxford University Press.

Woodward, J. (2010). Causation in biology: Stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biology & Philosophy, 25(3), 287–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-010-9200-z

Woodward, J. (2016). The problem of variable choice. Synthese, 193(4), 1047–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0810-5

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Colin Klein, Jakob Hohwy, Tim Bayne