Successful and unsuccessful remembering and imagining: Editorial introduction
PDF
HTML

How to Cite

Successful and unsuccessful remembering and imagining: Editorial introduction. (2024). Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.11736

Abstract

The relationship between memory and imagination has long intrigued philosophers. One focus of recent debate in this area has been the question whether memory and imagination differ in kind or merely in degree, with discontinuists holding that remembering indeed differs in kind from imagining, while continuists hold that even successful remembering differs from imagining only in degree. Another recent focus has been the need to approach memory and imagination from a broadly normative perspective, in an attempt to explain what it is for remembering and imagining to succeed or fail. The goal of this special issue, which builds on an online workshop organized in 2022 by the Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition at the National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and the Centre for Philosophy of Memory at the Université Grenoble Alpes, is to explore memory, imagination, and the relation between them from this normative perspective.

PDF
HTML

References

Margherita Arcangeli, Jérôme Dokic (2024). Two levels of confusion between imagination and memory. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10362

Matthew Frise (2024). Remembering trauma in epistemology. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10220

Amy Kind (2024). Accuracy in imagining. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10447

Changsheng Lai (2024). Relearning and remembering: A gradualist account. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10251

Peter Langland-Hassan (2024). Imagining what you intend. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10258

Felipe Morales Carbonell (2024). Going ballistic: The dynamics of the imagination and the issue of intentionalism. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10257

Daniel Munro (2024). Remembering religious experience: Reconstruction, reflection, and reliability. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10205

Denis Perrin, Michael Barkasi (2024). Immersing oneself into one’s past: subjective presence can be part of the experience of episodic remembering. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10392

Shin Sakuragi (2024). Successfully remembering a belief and the problem of forgotten evidence. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10244

André Sant'Anna (2024). Metacognition and the puzzle of alethic memory. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.9880

Marya Schechtman (2024). Personal identity and mental time travel. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10639

Lu Teng (2024). The justificatory power of memory experience. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10238

Fabrice Teroni (2024). Memory identification and its failures. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10386

Uku Tooming, Kengo Miyazono (2024). Prospects for epistemic generationism about memory. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10248

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Ying-Tung Lin, Christopher Jude McCarroll, Kourken Michaelian, Mike Stuart