Abstract
This essay deals with the early discussion of Molyneux’s question - which may hopefully cast some light on the contemporary debate – and is written from an historical point of view. I will claim that, in the eighteenth century history of Molyneux’s question, there is a leading figure: Denis Diderot; the most original and fruitful answer is given in his Lettre sur les aveugles à l’usage de ceux qui voient (1749). From the historical background of Diderot’s analysis, both the merits and limitations of the negative and positive answers, along with the inadequacy of the standard classification between “empiricists” and “rationalists”, will also emerge. Diderot’s “relativistic” solution is a turning point in the whole philosophical discussion of Molyneux’s question, in that it has been confirmed by clinical reports of surgical operations of blind people, starting from Cheselden’s case.
References
Ayers, M. R. (1991). Locke. Volume I: Epistemology, Volume II: Ontology. Routledge.
Banissoni, M., & Ponzo, E. (1968). Percezione strutturata e trasposizione di forme nelle prime esperienze visive di tre cieche dalla nascita operate di osteo-odonto-cheratoprotesi da Strampelli. Rivista Di Psicologia, 62, 515–535.
Berchielli, L. (2002). Color, space and figure in Locke: An interpretation of the Molyneux problem. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 40(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2002.0002
Berkeley, G. (1948). An essay towards a new theory of vision; theory of vision vindicated and explained. In A. A. Luce & T. E. Jessop (Eds.), The works (Vol. 1). T. Nelson; Sons.
Bourdon, B. (1902). La perception visuelle de l’espace. Librairie C. Reinwald, Schleicher Frères.
Buffon, G.-L. L. de. (1749). Histoire naturelle de l’homme (Vol. 1). de l’imprimerie royale.
Cassirer, E. (1932). Die Philosophie der Aufklärung. Mohr.
Cheselden, W. (1728). An account of some observations made by a young gentleman, who was born blind, or lost his sight so early, that he had no remembrance of ever having seen, and was couch’d between 13 and 14 years of age. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 35(402), 447–450. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1727.0038
Condillac, É. B. de. (1947a). Essai sur l’origine des connaissances humaines. In G. Le Roy (Ed.), Oeuvres philosophiques (Vol. 1). PUF.
Condillac, É. B. de. (1947b). Traité des sensations. In G. Le Roy (Ed.), Oeuvres philosophiques (Vol. 1). PUF.
Descartes, R. (1974). Dioptrique (1637). In C. Adam & P. Tannery (Eds.), Oeuvres de Descartes (Vol. 6). Vrin.
Diderot, D. (1975-2004). Lettre sur les aveugles à l’usage de ceux qui voient (1749). In H. Dickmann, J. Proust, J. Varloot, & J. Fabre (Eds.), Oeuvres complètes (Vol. 4). Hermann.
Diderot, D. (1916). Letter on the blind for the use of those who see. In M. Jourdain (Ed.), Early philosophical works. The Open Court.
Diderot, D. (1981). Opere filosofiche (P. Rossi, Ed.). Feltrinelli.
Gregory, R. L. (1966). Eye and brain. The psychology of seeing. Princeton University Press.
Leibniz, G. W. F. (1916). New essays concerning human understanding (A. G. Langley, Ed.). The Open Court Publishing.
Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding (P. H. Nidditch, Ed.). Clarendon Press.
Loeb, L. E. (1981). From Descartes to Hume. Continental metaphysics and the development of modern philosophy. Cornell University Press.
Merian, J.-B. (1770-1779). Sur le problème de Molyneux. Nouveaux Mémoires de Sciences Et Belles Lettres de l’Académie Royale de Berlin, (1770), 258–67; (1771), 267–89; (1772), 414–28; (1774), 439–52; (1775), 414–27; (1777), 255–68; (1779), 343–51; (1780), 399–413.
Morgan, M. J. (1977). Molyneux’s question. Vision, touch, and the philosophy of perception. Cambridge University Press.
Park, D. (1969). Locke and Berkeley on the Molyneux problem. Journal of the History of Ideas, 30(2), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708437
Preyer, W. (1892). The mind of the child. Appleton.
Sarti, C. (1792). L’ottica della natura e dell’educazione indirizzata a risolvere il famoso problema di Molineux. Bonsignori. https://catalog.lib.uchicago.edu/vufind/Record/397061
Vaughn, A. (2019). Is Locke’s answer to Molyneux’s question inconsistent? A cross-modal recognition and the sight–recognition error. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 49(5), 670–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1444899
Voltaire. (1763). Elements of the philosophy of Newton. In T. Smollett & T. et al. Francklin (Eds.), The works of Voltaire (Vol. 26). Newbery, J.; Baldwin, R.; Johnston, W.; Crowder, S.; Davies, T.; Coote, J.; Kearsley, G.; Collins, B.; at Salisbury. http://books.google.com/books?id=KDcLAAAAQAAJ&oe=UTF-8
Voltaire. (1967). Éléments de la philosophie de Newton (1738). In L. Moland (Ed.), Oeuvres complètes (Vol. 22). Kraus Reprint.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Silvia Parigi