How radical is perceptual malleability? A reply to commentators

Versions

HTML
PDF

Keywords

Malleability of perception
Modularity
Perceptual learning
Perceptual expertise
Cognitive architecture
Epistemology of perception

How to Cite

Stokes, D. R. (2023). How radical is perceptual malleability? A reply to commentators. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 4. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2023.10954 (Original work published July 5, 2023)

Abstract

The unifying theme across all four commentaries is the question: just how radical are the ideas contained in, and implied by, Thinking and Perceiving? Does the abandonment of the modularity of mind, and an embrace of the malleability of mind, have wide reaching consequences for empirical studies of sensory perception, for cognitive architecture, for the metaphysics of mind and the epistemology of perception? And which of those consequences are welcomed, and which of those are problematic? These general questions anchor in (at least) the following topics: learning and the role of cognition, object recognition, perceptual expertise, early versus late vision, perception and truth, virtue epistemology, and computational architectures of mind. This reply attempts to address the overarching question from this variety of angles taken in the four commentaries.

https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2023.10954
HTML
PDF

References

Gauthier, I., Tarr, M.J. (1997). Becoming a “Greeble” expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673–1682. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00286-6

Humphreys G., Price C., Riddoch J. (1999). From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach". Psychological Research, 62 (2–3), 118-130.

doi:10.1007/s004260050046. PMID 10472198. S2CID 13783299.

Kvanvig, J.L. (2003). The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman

Raftopoulos, A. (2009). Cognition and Perception: How Do Psychology and Neural Science Inform Philosophy? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Riddoch, M., & Humphreys, G. (2001). Object Recognition. In B. Rapp (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hove: Psychology Press.

Scott, L.S., Tanaka, J.W., Sheinberg, D.L., Curran, T. (2008). The Role of Category Learning in the Acquisition and Retention of Perceptual expertise: A Behavioral and Neurophysiological Study. Brain Research, 1210, 204– 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.02.054

Siegel, S. (2017). The Rationality of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tanaka, J.W., Curran, T., Sheinberg, D.L. (2005). The Training and Transfer of Real-world Perceptual expertise. Psychological Science, 16, 145–151. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00795

Van Gelder, T. (1995). What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation? Journal of Philosophy 92 (7):345 - 381.

Zagzebski, L.T. (2001). Recovering understanding. In Steup, M. (Ed.), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

_____ (2003). The Search for the Source of Epistemic Good. Metaphilosophy, 34 (1‐2), 12-28. 10.1111/meta.2003.34.issue-1-2

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Dustin R. Stokes