Going ballistic: The dynamics of the imagination and the issue of intentionalism

Versions

PDF
HTML

Keywords

aboutness
imagination
mental ballistics
mental dynamics

How to Cite

Morales Carbonell, F. (2024). Going ballistic: The dynamics of the imagination and the issue of intentionalism. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10257

Abstract

Do we have control over the content of our imaginings? More precisely: do we have control over what our imaginings are about? Intentionalists say yes. Until recently, intentionalism could be taken as the received view. Recently, authors like Munro & Strohminger (2021) have developed some arguments against it. Here, I tentatively join their ranks and develop a new way to think about the way in which imaginings develop their contents that also goes against intentionalism. My proposal makes use of what we may call a ballistic framework for mental dynamics, which I sketch to some length. In this model, imaginings are articulated by ballistic events sensitive to constraints that modify the trajectories that imaginings trace in a special working space. This framework leaves room for alternatives to pre-assigned-content models, such as Kung’s (2016). In the ballistic-based models sketched here, and against intentionalism, imaginings can fail to be about what we intend them to be about. The framework also has applications beyond the intentionalism debate, some of which I will sketch.

https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10257
PDF
HTML

References

Balcerak Jackson, M. (2018). Justification by imagination. In F. Macpherson & F. Dorsch (eds.) Perceptual Imagination and Perceptual Memory, 209-226. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baron, Sam, Colyvan, Mark & Ripley, David (2017). How mathematics can make a difference. Philosophers' Imprint, 17(3), 1-19.

Berto, Francesco (2017). Impossible worlds and the logic of imagination. Erkentniss, 82, 1277–1297.

Berto, Francesco (2018). Aboutness in imagination. Philosophical Studies, 175, 1871-1886.

Berto, Francesco & Schoonen, Tom (2018). Conceivability and possibility: some dilemmas for Humeans. Synthese. 195 (6): 2697-2715.

Brooks, Vernon B. (1983). Motor control. Physical Therapy, 63(5): 664–673.

Buckareff, Andrei A. (2005). How (not) to think about mental action. Philosophical Explorations. 8(1): 83–89.

Carlucci, Donald & Jacobson, Sidney (2007). Ballistics: Theory and Design of Guns and Ammunition. CRC Press.

Christoff, Kalina, Irving, Zachary, Fox, Kieran, Spreng, R. Nathan & Andrews-Hanna, Jessica (2016). Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework. Nat Rev Neurosci 17, 718–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.113

Clark, Andy (2016) Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action and the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

de Bruin, Leon, Jongepier, Fleur & Strijbos, Derek (2015). Mental agency as self-regulation. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 6(4): 815–825.

Desmedt, J. E., & Godaux, E. (1979). Voluntary motor commands in human ballistic movements. Annals of Neurology. 5(5): 415–421.

Dorsch, Fabian (2012). The Unity of Imagining. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Dorsch, Fabian (2016). Knowledge by imagination—how imaginative experience can ground factual knowledge. Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 35(3): 87–116.

Evans, Jonathan (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255–278.

Evans, Jonathan & Stanovich, Keith (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3): 223-241.

Fodor, Jerry (1975) The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.

Gelfert, Alex. (2016). How to do science with models. Dordrecht: Springer.

Irving, Zachary C. (2021). Drifting and directed minds: the significance of mind-wandering for mental agency. The Journal of Philosophy. 118(11): 614-644.

Kind, Amy (2001). Putting the image back in imagination. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 62(1): 85-109.

Kind, Amy (2016). Imagining under constraints. In A. Kind & P. Kung (eds.), Knowledge through Imagination, 145–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kind, Amy (2019) Mary’s powers of imagination. In S. Coleman (ed.), The Knowledge Argument, 161-179. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kind, Amy (2020). The skill of imagination. In Ellen Fridland & Carlotta Pavese (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Skill and Expertise, 335-346. London: Routledge.

Kind, Amy & Kung, Peter (2016). Introduction. In A. Kind & P. Kung (dds.), Knowledge through Imagination, 1–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kung, Peter (2010). Imagining as a guide to possibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 81(3): 620–663.

Kung, Peter (2016). You really do imagine it: against error theories of imagination. Noûs, 50(1): 90–120.

Langland-Hassan, Peter (2016). On choosing what to imagine. In A. Kind & P. Kung (Eds.), Knowledge through Imagination, 61–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Langland-Hassan, Peter (2020). Explaining Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Levy, Yair (2019). What is ‘mental action’? Philosophical Psychology. 32(6):971-993.

Massimi, Michela. (2019). Two Kinds of Exploratory Models. Philosophy of Science, 86(5), 869-881.

McCoy, Robert (2012). Modern Exterior Ballistics: The Launch and Flight Dynamics of Symmetric Projectiles. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Military History.

McGinn, Colin (2004). Mindsight. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Munro, Daniel & Strohminger, Margot (2021). Are We Free to Imagine What We Choose? Synthese 199: 11847–11864.

Myers, Joshua (2021). The epistemic status of the imagination. Philosophical Studies, 178(10): 3251-3270.

Ryle, Gilbert (1949) The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.

Sartre, Jean Paul (1972). The Psychology of Imagination. London: Methuen.

Sher, Gila (2016) Epistemic Friction: An Essay on Knowledge, Truth, and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Strawson, Galen (2003). Mental ballistics or the involuntariness of spontaneity. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 103(1): 227-256.

Stuart, Michael (2021). Towards a dual process epistemology of imagination. Synthese, 198:1329–1350.

Tidman, Paul (1994) Conceivability as a test for possibility. American Philosophical Quarterly. 31(4), 297–309.

Vaidya, Anand .J., & Wallner, Michael. (2021) The epistemology of modality and the problem of modal epistemic friction. Synthese, 198 (Suppl 8): 1909–1935.

Walton, Douglas (1990) Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

White, Alan (1990). The Language of Imagination. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Williams, Bernard (1966) Imagination and the self. British Academy Annual Philosophical Lecture. Reprinted in Problems of the Self (1973). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, Daniel (2021) Imaginative constraints and generative models. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 99(1): 68-82.

Williamson, Timothy (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1981). Zettel. trans G. E. M. Anscombe, 2nd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Felipe Morales Carbonell